Survey of Students Satisfaction and Some Efforts to Improve Lecturer Profesionalism in the English Education Department of STKIP Situs Banten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v6i01.2507
Abstract viewed : 220 times
| 
PDF downloaded : 180 times
Keywords:
Student’s Satisfaction, Professionalism, Competence, Descriptive Qualitative, Interactive ModelAbstract
This study aims to determine the level of student satisfaction with the performance of lecturers, especially in the lecture processes and academic services; and examine the efforts that made by STKIP Situs Banten in improving the professionalism of lecturers. The study used descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniques through questionnaires, document analysis, literature study, and interviews. Data were obtained from the questionnaire was processed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 21 application which was then interpreted descriptively. Meanwhile, the data obtained from the analysis of documents, literature studies, and interviews were analyzed using the interactive model of Milles and Huberman, namely data collection, data reduction, data presentations, and conclusions. The results of this study indicate that overall students feel very satisfied in academic services, this shows that the performance of lecturers can be categorized very well. In addition, some efforts to improve the professionalism of lecturers can be done by developing pedagogical competencies, information engineering competencies, management / administrative competencies, curriculum competencies, scientific competencies (research and publications), evaluation competencies; and personal competence.
Downloads
References
Ardianingsih, A., & Yunitarini, S. (2015). Etika, Profesi Dosen dan Perguruan Tinggi: Sebuah Kajian Konseptual. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 10(1).
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2015). Teaching in Nursing-e-Book: A Guide for Faculty. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Dwirahayu, G. (2018). Survey Kepuasan Civitas Akademika terhadap Layanan di UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Tahun 2018. LPM UIN Jakarta.
Gillespie, K. J., & Robertson, D. L. (2010). A Guide to Faculty Development. The Jossey-Bass Publisher.
Gunawan, I. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bumi Aksara.
Indriani, W. (2015). Kontribusi Etos Kerja Islami Terhadap Kinerja Dosen. El-Idare: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 173–188.
Irwansyah, M. (2015). Sistem Informasi Repository Digital Beban Kerja Dosen. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN), 1(1).
Kadarisman, M. (2017). Tantangan Perguruan Tinggi dalam Era Persaingan Global. Sociae Polites, 1(1), 3–20.
Kholik, A. (2016). Pengaruh Kompetensi Dosen dan Kepuasan Kerja Dosen terhadap Kinerja Dosen di Universitas Djuanda Bogor [Doctoral Dissertation]. IAIN Surakarta.
Kisworo, B., Utsman, U., Ilyas, I., & Siswanto, Y. (2018). Kepuasan Mahasiswa dan Pengguna Lulusan Program Studi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah Universitas Negeri Semarang. Journal of Nonformal Education and Community Empowerment, 2(2).
Kumaladewi, N., & Sugiarti, Y. (2016). Design Analysis of Data Warehouse for Lecturer Performance Evaluation (Case Study: Faculty of Science and Technology UIN Jakarta). 2016 4th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, 1–6.
Kusnan, K. (2018). Kebijakan Mutu Peningkatan Dosen. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra’, 11(2).
Muhtarom, A. (2015). Implementasi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Peningkatan Profesionlitas Dosen Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam Provinsi Banten. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(02), 117–130.
Mukti, T. A. (2019). Mendorong Penerapan Pendidikan Antikorupsi di Perguruan Tinggi. Perspektif Hukum, 18(2), 328–346.
Muniar, A. Y. (2013). Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Pada STMIK AKBA. Inspiration: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 3(2).
Mustafid, H. (2017). Peningkatan Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara melalui Budaya Organisasi. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(01), 1–14. https://doi.org/doi:10.32678/tarbawi.v3i01.1775
Noor, W., & Juhji, J. (2020). Integrasi Budaya Prestasi pada Fungsi Perencanaan Pembinaan Mutu Dosen. AL-TANZIM: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 1–12.
Ouellett, M. L. (2010). Overview of Faculty Development. A Guide to Faculty Development, 2, 3–20.
Pramudyo, A. (2010). Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Dosen Negeri pada Kopertis Wilayah V Yogyakarta. JBTI: Jurnal Bisnis: Teori Dan Implementasi, 1(1), 1–11.
Retnowati, T. H., Mardapi, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2018). Kinerja Dosen di Bidang Penelitian dan Publikasi Ilmiah. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(2), 215–225.
Sasono, E. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perguruan Tinggi; Tantangan dan Kebutuhan. Jurnal STIE Semarang, 6(2), 77–100.
Son, H., & Faisal, R. (2017). Aplikasi Penilaian Kinerja Dosen pada Proses Belajar Mengajar Berbasis Web: Studi Kasus di Badan Penjamin Mutu Internal Institut Teknologi Padang. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Komputer, 5(2), 89–93.
Subekt, H., Taufiq, M., Susilo, H., Ibrohim, I., & Suwono, H. (2018). Mengembangkan Literasi Informasi Melalui Belajar Berbasis Kehidupan Terintegrasi Stem Untuk Menyiapkan Calon Guru Sains Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Revieu Literatur. Education and Human Development Journal, 3(1).
Sukmanasa, E., Novita, L., & Siti, F. (2017). Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Kinerja Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Pakuan. Pedagonal| Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(2), 91–99.
Supardi, S. (2017). Statistik Penelitian Pendidikan. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
.jpg)
