University Governance and Dean’s Leadership in Improving Lecturer Performance

Authors

  • Edi Mulyadi Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia
  • Suhaya Suhaya Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia
  • Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan Departemen Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v6i01.2563
Statistics: Abstract viewed : 130 times | PDF downloaded : 95 times

Keywords:

University Governance, Leadership, Lecturer Performance

Abstract

Research is based on the idea that university governance and the dean's leadership are very important for improving lecturer performance. This study aims to analyze the effect of university governance and the dean's leadership on the performance of lecturers at the Islamic University of Sheikh-Yusuf (UNIS).. The study uses a quantitative approach with correlation and regression analysis techniques. The sample size of the study was 40 lecturers taken using proportional stratified random sampling. The research gives the result that there is a positive and significant influence on the university governance on the performance of lecturers at the Islamic University of Syekh-Yusuf. University governance has a positive and significant effect of 71.06% on the performance of lecturers; dean leadership has a positive and significant effect of 16.40% on lecturer performance, and together there is a positive and significant effect of university governance and dean's leadership of 73.59% on the performance of lecturers at the Islamic University of Syekh-Yusuf.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bateh, J. & Heyliger, W. (2014). Academic Administrator Leadership Styles and the Impact on Faculty Job Satisfaction. The Journal of Leadership Education, 13(3), 34–49. DOI: 10.12806/V13/I3/RF3
Benardin, H. J. & Russel, J. E. (1993). Human Resource Management: An Experiential Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chairunnisa, C. (2015). Hubungan tata kelola universitas dan profesionalitas Dosen, dengan mutu layanan pendidikan. Faktor Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(3), 184–197.
Chalhoub, S. M. (2010). Innovation management and though leadership: A cultural requirement in a global competitive environment. The Journal of American of Business, 16(1), 240-245.
Dahri, N.W. & Akil, M. (2018). Budaya organisasional, kepuasan kerja, dan komitmen organisasional dalam meningkatkan perilaku inovatif. Jurnal Bisnis Teori dan Implementasi, 9(2), 191–199.
Fielden, J. (2008). Global Trends in University Governance. Washington: World Bank.
Ghaffari, S., Shah, I. M., Burgoyne, J., Nazri, M., & Salleh. J.R. (2017). The Influence of Motivation on Job Performance: A Case Study at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Aust. J. Basic & Appl. Sci., 11(4), 92–99.
Glasman, N. S. (1986). Three evaluation-related Behaviors of the school principal. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysisnal, 8(3), 227–236. DOI: 10.3102/01623737008003227.
Harahap, D. A. & Riyandi, R. (2015). Pengaruh budaya organisasi dan motivasi berprestasi terhadap kinerja dosen universitas riau kepulauan batam tahun akademik 2014/2015. Jurnal dimensi, 4(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33373/dms.v4i3.
Kelley, N. (2002). Notes on the political economy of black music. In Rhythm and Busissenss. Ed. Norman Kelly. New York: Akshic Books.
Lembaga Administrasi Negara. (1993). Sistem administrasi negara Republik Indonesia.
Jakarta: CV Haji Masagung.
Murgatroyd, S., & Morgan, M. (1993). Total Quality Management and The School. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Nurdin, S. (2001). Penerapan Model Pendekatan Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) dalam Pembelajaran IPS di Sekolah Dasar. Disertasi Doktor pada Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Tidak diterbitkan.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge. T. A. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi (Buku 1 dan 2). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Ruseffendi, E. T. (1994). Dasar-dasar penelitian pendidikan dan bidang non-eksakta lainnya. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.
Peraturan Presiden R.I No.8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia.
Pearce, C.L. & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Sari, T. U. (2019). The effect of ethical leadership on voice behavior: the role of mediators organizational identification and moderating self-efficacy for voice. Journal of Leadership in Organizations, 1(1), 48–66.
Shattock, M. (2003). Managing Successful Universities. Maidenhead. England: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Sriyanti & Dahlan, J. A. (2017). The effects of organizational culture, leadership behavior, and job satisfaction on employee organizational commitment. Journal of Positive Management, 8(4), 80–96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2017.132.
Sulistijani, S., & Rosida, R. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Suprihati, S. (2014). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja Karyawan perusahaan Sari Jati di Sragen. Jurnal Paradigma, 12(01), 93–112.
Surya, M. (2000). Psikologi pembeljaran dan pengajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Bani Quraisy.
Syahrul, L., Herri, Johan, A. P., & Ahmad, A. W. (2016). Identifikasi kompetensi utama manajerial dan kepemimpinan pengelola perguruan tinggi tingkat jurusan. Prosiding National Conference of Applied Sciences, Engineering, Business and. Information Technology. Politeknik Negeri Padang, 15–16 Oktober 2016.
Timpe, A. D. (1993). Kinerja (performance). Jakarta: Gramedia.
Trisnaningsih. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Kinerja Dosen Akuntansi pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Jawa Timur Tahun 2007. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing, 8(1).
Tirtaputra, I. P. A., & Surya, I. A. K. (2016). Pengaruh kepemimpinan transformasional dan kepuasan kerja terhadap komitmen organisasional pada UPTKesmas Sukawati II. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 5(4), 2080–2107.
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.
UPI. (2009). Pedoman penilaian kinerja dosen. Tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: FIP.
Yukl, G.A. (2005). Leadership in Organizations. Simon & Schuster(Asia) Pte. Ltd.
Yusrizal, Y. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kinerja dosen di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Parameter, 29(1), DOI: doi.org/10.21009/parameter.291.10.
Wijatno, S. (2009). Pengelolaan perguruan tinggi secara efisien, efektif, dan ekonomis untuk meningkatkan mutu penyelenggaraan pendidikan dan mutu lulusan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-30

How to Cite

Mulyadi, E., Suhaya, S., & Dahlan, J. A. (2020). University Governance and Dean’s Leadership in Improving Lecturer Performance. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(01), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v6i01.2563

Issue

Section

Original Research Article