Tracing the Shift in Quality Management Paradigms: A Systematic Review of Taylor, Shewhart, and Deming in the Context of Islamic Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v11i01.11328


Keywords:
Quality management, Statistical process control, Total quality management, Industry 4.0, Maqasid SyariahAbstract
This study aims to systematically analyze the evolution of quality management paradigms and investigate their integration potential within Islamic educational institutions. Employing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology following PRISMA guidelines, the researchers examined 18 high-quality articles from Scopus-indexed journals. The findings reveal that traditional quality theories remain relevant but require thoughtful adaptation in the digital era. Three main themes emerged: the evolution and potential tensions between quality management theories, the transformative and empowering role of statistical process control in educational assessment, and the impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on quality assurance in Islamic education contexts. The researchers propose an "Islamic Education Quality 4.0" framework that integrates technological advancements with Islamic educational principles, balancing data-driven decision-making with ethical considerations rooted in Maqasid Syariah. This research contributes to the theoretical understanding and practical implementation of integrated quality management approaches in Islamic educational institutions, emphasizing the need for contextually appropriate quality models that enhance operational excellence while preserving core spiritual values.
Downloads
References
Aldi, B. E. (2024). Peran Pemikiran Taylor dalam Rerangka Scientific Management dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Manajemen dari Amerika Serikat sampai China. Equilibrium-Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi (EJBA), 18(1), 113-123. https://journal.ukrim.ac.id/index.php/jem/article/view/562
Alsadi, J., Antony, J., Mezher, T., Jayaraman, R., & Maalouf, M. (2023). Lean and Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis, opportunities for future research directions. Quality Management Journal, 30(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2022.2144785
Antony, J., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Toner, A., Bhat, S., Cudney, E. A., & Doulatabadi, M. (2022). Benefits, challenges, critical success factors and motivations of Quality 4.0 – A qualitative global study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(13–14), 1400–1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2113737
Antony, J., McDermott, O., & Sony, M. (2022). Quality 4.0 conceptualisation and theoretical understanding: A global exploratory qualitative study. The TQM Journal, 34(5), 1169–1188. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2021-0215
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., Bahroun, Z., & Banimfreg, B. H. (2020). The role of internet of things in food supply chain quality management: A review. Quality Management Journal, 28(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2020.1838978
Bernardo, B., São Mamede, H., Barroso, J. M. P., & Santos, V. (2024). Data governance & quality management: Innovation and breakthroughs across different fields. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(4), Article 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100598
Carvalho, A. M., Dias, A. R., Dias, A. M., & Sampaio, P. (2024). The Quality 4.0 roadmap: Designing a capability roadmap toward quality management in Industry 4.0. Quality Management Journal, 31(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2024.2317478
Dar, S. A. (2022). The relevance of Taylor’s scientific management in the modern era. Journal of Psychology and Political Science, 2(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.55529/jpps.26.1.6
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11457.001.0001
Dias, A.M., Carvalho, A.M. and Sampaio, P. (2022), "Quality 4.0: literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 1312-1335. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0247
Dirga Ayu Lestari, M., Mutaqin, M. Z., & Solihin. (2024). Manajemen mutu pendidikan karakter dalam perspektif Deming, Juran dan Crosby. Masagi: Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 1(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.29313/masagi.v1i2.5430
Evans, J. R. (2015). Modern analytics and the future of quality and performance excellence. Quality Management Journal, 22(4), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2015.11918447
Fuchs, E. (1993). Total quality management from the future: Practices and paradigms. Quality Management Journal, 1(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.1993.11918634
Goeke, R. J., & Offodile, O. F. (2005). Forecasting management philosophy life cycles: A comparative study of Six Sigma and TQM. Quality Management Journal, 12(2), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2005.11919248
Gupta, M., Adams, A., & Raho, L. (2003). Traditional management, quality management, and constraints management: Perceptions of ASQ members. Quality Management Journal, 10(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2003.11919061
Heady, R. B., & Smith, M. (1995). An empirical study of the topical differences between total quality management and quality management. Quality Management Journal, 2(3), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.1995.11918689
Hines, P., Tortorella, G. L., Antony, J., & Romero, D. (2023). Lean Industry 4.0: Past, present, and future. Quality Management Journal, 30(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2022.2144786
Isniah, S., & Purba, H. H. (2021). The application of using Statistical Process Control (SPC) method: Literature review and research issues. Spektrum Industri, 19(2), 125–133.
https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v19i2.19035
Mayangsari, M., Ulwiyah, N., & Qoyyimah, U. (2023). William Edward Deming’s model planning. Edusoshum: Journal of Islamic Education and Social Humanities, 3(3), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.52366/edusoshum.v3i3.86
Oschman, J. J. (2017). The role of strategic planning in implementing a total quality management framework: An empirical view. Quality Management Journal, 24(2), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2017.11918508
Randles, R., & Finnegan, A. (2023). Guidelines for writing a systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 125, 105803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105803
Santoso, N. T. (2021). Relevansi praktik Quality Management System pada Industri 4.0: Suatu pendekatan investasi. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Akuntansi (JPENSI), 6(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.30736/jpensi.v6i1.683
Schonberger, R. (2014). Quality management and lean: A symbiotic relationship. Quality Management Journal, 21(3), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2014.11918392
Sibawaihi, S., Suyatno, S., Suyadi, S., & Fernandes, V. (2024). Transforming Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia from “institutes/colleges” into “universities”: Globalization or glocalization?. Management in Education, 08920206241268506. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206241268506
Sony, M., Antony, J., Douglas, J. A., & McDermott, O. (2021). Motivations, barriers and readiness factors for Quality 4.0 implementation: An exploratory study. The TQM Journal, 33(6), 1502–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2020-0272
Tavana, M., Di Caprio, D., & Rostamkhani, R. (2025). A total quality management action plan assessment model in supply chain management using the lean and agile scores. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(1), Article 100633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100633
Triyanto, H., Bachtiar, H., Jailani, M. S., & Harja, H. (2024). Sejarah perkembangan manajemen mutu. Journal on Education, 6(2), 15503–15510. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.5429
Toke, L. K., & Kalpande, S. D. (2020). Total quality management in small and medium enterprises: An overview in Indian context. Quality Management Journal, 27(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2020.1767008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hesty Widiastuty, Fauzi Fauzi, Dakir Dakir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.