Evaluation of Multi-Literacy Education Program at The Community Learning Activity Center in Palangka Raya City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v8i01.4994
Abstract viewed : 186 times
| 
PDF downloaded : 180 times
Keywords:
Program evaluation, CIPP, Multiliterate Education ProgramAbstract
This is related to the quality of one's life so that it can open up public insight. The purpose of this study was to analyze the evaluation of the program on the aspects of context, input, process, and product of the multi-literacy education program at Learning Center (PKBM) Luthfillah, Palangka Raya. PKBM is an educational facility provided to provide non-formal education for citizens. Evaluation of the program that has been implemented uses the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model by analyzing the components of the context, input, process, and product of the Multiliteracy Education program implemented. This research is a type of qualitative research. The research instruments used were observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the research show: (1) in the context aspect, the program implemented has fulfilled the learning needs of the students, and the program objectives can be achieved as expected; (2) in the input aspect, educators and program organizers already have the expected competencies. It's just that for the initial abilities of students, the basic requirements for ownership of the Sukma have not been met; (3) in the process aspect, the learning strategies used are in accordance with the conditions of the students, namely andragogic, practical, and thematic strategies; (4) in the product aspect, students have graduated from the advanced literacy education program and have been able to apply the learning outcomes that have been obtained. However, the student's graduation certificate has not been received in the form of SUKMA-L.
Downloads
References
Ali Sadikin, I. M. & M. S. (2020). Pengantar Manajemen dan Bisnis. K-Media.
Arikunto, S., & Jabbar. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
BP-PAUD, & Tengah, D. K. (2018). Laporan Hasil Studi Eksplorasi Program Pendidikan Masyarakat.
Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Keaksaraan dan Kesetaraan. (2018). Petunjuk Teknis Bantuan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Multikeaksaraan.
Ditbindiktara. (2016). Naskah Akademik Pendidikan Multikeaksaraan. Kemendikbud, Ditjen PAUD dan Dikmas.
Ditbindiktara. (2018). Panduan Penyelenggaraan dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Multikeaksaraan. Kemendikbud, Ditjen PAUD dan Dikmas.
Gunawan, I., & Benty, D. D. N. (2017). Manajemen Pendidikan: Suatu Pengantar Praktik. Alfabeta.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Silabus Pendidikan Multikeaksaraan.
Kosasih, E. (2014). Strategi Belajar dan Pembelajaran Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Yrama Widya.
Marzuki, S. (2010). Pendidikan Nonformal: Dimensi dalam Keaksaraan Fungsional, Pelatihan, dan Andragogi. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, Pub. L. No. 20 (2003).
Sanggar, D. I., & Belajar, K. (2019). Pola Penyelenggaraan Keaksaraan Dasar. X(2).
Stromquist, N. P. (2009). Literacfy and Empowerment: A Contribution to The Debate. University of Maryland.
Stufflebeam, & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. Guilford Press.
Sudjana, D. (2008). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sumiati, & Asra. (2007). Metode Pembelajaran. CV. Wacana Prima.
Suminar, U., Hisyam, M., & Sabighoot, Y. A. (2021). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Multikeaksaraan Keberaksaraan dengan Ragam Kemahiran Lokal. Judika (Jurnal Pendidikan UNSIKA), 9(2), 245–260.
Wijayanti, S. (2014). Evaluasi Program Keaksaraan Berbasis Seni Budaya Lokal Untuk Pemberdayaan Di Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (Studi Kasus di PKBM Harmoni Desa Kotayasa Kec. Sumbang, KAB. Banyumas).
.jpg)
