Beyond Technology Adoption: Differential Associations of Technological Planning Tools with Institutional Goal Achievement in Nigerian Public Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v12i02.12737
Abstrak viewed : 0 times
| 
PDF (English) downloaded : 0 times
Kata Kunci:
Goal Achievement, Higher Education, Learning Management Systems, Project Management Software, Strategic Planning Software, Technological PlanningAbstrak
This study examined the relationship between technological planning tools and the achievement of institutional goals in public universities in Kwara State, Nigeria. Using a cross-sectional correlational survey design, the study involved 182 academic and non-academic staff from two public universities. Data were collected through the validated Technological Planning and Goal Achievement Questionnaire (TPGAQ), which demonstrated a reliability coefficient of 0.73. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the level, integration, challenges, and adoption of technological planning, while Pearson product-moment correlation was employed to determine the relationships between specific technological planning tools and institutional goal achievement at the 0.05 significance level. The findings showed a generally high level of technological planning and institutional integration, although inadequate funding, poor maintenance culture, and limited ICT personnel remained key implementation challenges. Project management software had the highest adoption level, whereas collaboration tools had the lowest. The technological planning tools were significantly and positively associated with institutional goal achievement (r = .425, p < .001). Among the specific tools, strategic planning software demonstrated the strongest association (r = .313), followed by collaboration tools (r = .252), project management software (r = .219), and learning management systems (r = .205). These findings indicate that technological planning is associated with institutional goal achievement, but the extent of technology adoption does not necessarily correspond to the strength of its organizational association. The study highlights the importance of strategic alignment, sustainable funding, technical capacity, maintenance, and continuous evaluation in strengthening technology-enabled institutional planning. Given the correlational design, the findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects.
Unduhan
Referensi
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues1, 2. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization science, 18(5), 763-780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0306
Benavides, L. M. C., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Cowling, M. A., Vanderburg, R., & Vanderburg, M. A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks, and metrics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16403-16429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11846-x
Fernández, A., Gómez, B., Binjaku, K., & Meçe, E. K. (2023). Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review. Education and information technologies, 28(10), 12351-12382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0
Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070746
Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and information technologies, 27(3), 3171-3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
Karim, M. S., Nahar, S., & Demirbag, M. (2022). Resource-based perspective on ICT use and firm performance: A meta-analysis investigating the moderating role of cross-country ICT development status. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121626
Lehmann, T., Blumschein, P., & Seel, N. M. (2023). Accept it or forget it: mandatory digital learning and technology acceptance in higher education. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(4), 797-817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00244-w
Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research: S. Nadkarni, R. Prügl. Management review quarterly, 71(2), 233-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7
Pesce, D., & Neirotti, P. (2023). The impact of IT–business strategic alignment on firm performance: The evolving role of IT in industries. Information & Management, 60(5), 103800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103800
Ramadania, R., Hartijasti, Y., Purmono, B. B., Haris, N., Muhammad, D., & Afifi, M. Z. (2024). A Systematic Review on Digital Transformation and Organizational Performance in Higher Education. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(4), 1239-1252. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190402
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The journal of strategic information systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148626
Warner, K. S., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long range planning, 52(3), 326-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
Werder, K., & Richter, J. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effects of IT capability toward agility and performance: New directions for information systems research. Plos one, 17(10), e0268761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268761
Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in higher education: A systematic review. Sage Open, 14(1), 21582440241229570. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Afeez Adeshina Shittu, Nuvie Nunu Brown-Ovie Aruekure, Bolatito Abibat Oduwole, Tejidini Lateef Ahmed, Kingsley Chigozie Akpala
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
