Principal Raudhatul Athfal's Participatory Behavior Practices in Implementing the Independent Curriculum in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v9i02.9283


Abstrak
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis praktik perilaku partisipatif Ketua Raudhatul Athfal dalam penerapan kurikulum mandiri. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian fenomenologis. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Data yang telah terkumpul kemudian dianalisis dengan teknik analisis data model Miles dan Huberman yang terdiri dari reduksi data, penyajian data, dan verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik perilaku partisipatif terhadap guru dalam penerapan kurikulum mandiri dan moderasi beragama di RA Nurul Dzikri dilakukan melalui tiga upaya sebagai berikut: (1) Melibatkan guru dalam pengambilan keputusan terkait penerapan kurikulum mandiri; (2) Melibatkan guru dalam melakukan pengendalian diri terhadap kinerjanya dalam penerapan kurikulum independen dan memberikan otonomi kepada guru dalam bekerja menyelesaikan tugasnya dan (3) Melibatkan guru dalam mengontrol praktik kepemimpinan dalam penerapan kurikulum independen. Keterlibatan ketiga guru ini menjadikan guru diposisikan penuh sebagai perancang dan pelaksana utama dalam penerapan kurikulum mandiri. Hal ini memberi mereka otonomi luas untuk mengelola kurikulum mandiri di kelas.
Unduhan
Referensi
Abdul Razzak, N. (2016). Strategies for effective faculty involvement in online activities aimed at promoting critical thinking and deep learning. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9359-z
Aminah, S., & Nursikin, M. (2023). Tugas guru di kelas dalam implementasi kurikulum merdeka: Perspektif Islam. Journal on Education, 5(4), 12710–12719. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2259
Asrar-ul-Haq, M., Anwar, S., & Hassan, M. (2017). Impact of emotional intelligence on teacher׳s performance in higher education institutions of Pakistan. Future Business Journal, 3(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.05.003
Cardona, P., & Rey, C. (2022). Management by missions: Connecting people to strategy through purpose. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83780-8
Carlyon, T., & Branson, C. (2018). Educational change: A view from the bottom up. Teachers’ Work, 15(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v15i2.254
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2018). A needs-supportive intervention to help PE teachers enhance students’ prosocial behavior and diminish antisocial behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 35, 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.11.010
Da’as, R. (2021). School principals’ skills and teacher absenteeism during Israeli educational reform: Exploring the mediating role of participation in decision-making, trust and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 53–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09385-0
Dagnew Kelkay, A. (2020). School principals’ and supervisors’ leadership practices in teachers’ continuous professional development program: In secondary school of Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1524933
Devi, A. D., & Subiyantoro, S. (2021). Implementation of democratic leadership style and transformational head of madrasah in improving the quality. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v6i1.1162
Dowling, R., Lloyd, K., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2016). Qualitative methods 1: Enriching the interview. Progress in Human Geography, 40(5), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515596880
Englander, M. (2016). The phenomenological method in qualitative psychology and psychiatry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11(1), 30682. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30682
Fahri, A., Yuliantri, R. D. A., Khoiriyah, F., & Triansyah, F. A. (2023). Creating students with superior character: Implementation of P5 project in mobilizing schools. Jurnal Qalamuna, 15(2), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i2.2800
Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2014). Clinical supervision: The state of the art: Clinical supervision: State of the art. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(11), 1030–1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22124
Farhan, B. Y. (2018). Application of path-goal leadership theory and learning theory in a learning organization. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 34(1), 13–22.
Forey, G., & Cheung, L. M. E. (2019). The benefits of explicit teaching of language for curriculum learning in the physical education classroom. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.01.001
Fransiska, J., Dumiyati, D., Mariam, P., Hikmah, N., & Haris, M. (2023). Education management in the independent curriculum in elementary schools. Al-Fikrah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.31958/jaf.v11i1.8696
Geesa, R. L., Odell, K. M., Kruczek, T., Elam, N. P., Boyland, L. G., & Ceresa, M. L. (2021). A principal-school counselor relational leadership model to improve student mental well-being. In The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse (pp. 1–26). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39666-4_119-1
Hoque, K. E., & Raya, Z. T. (2023). Relationship between principals’ leadership styles and teachers’ behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020111
House, R. J. (1975). Path-goal theory of leadership. Washington University.
House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7
Kahlke, R. M. (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300119
Liu, Z., Manh, V., Yang, X., Huang, X., Lekadir, K., Campello, V., Ravikumar, N., Frangi, A. F., & Ni, D. (2021). Style curriculum learning for robust medical image segmentation. In M. de Bruijne, P. C. Cattin, S. Cotin, N. Padoy, S. Speidel, Y. Zheng, & C. Essert (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021 (Vol. 12901, pp. 451–460). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87193-2_43
MesutSagnak. (2016). Participative leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship: The mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Journal, 16(62), 0–0.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis (Fourth Edition). Sage.
Nanayakkara, J., Margerison, C., & Worsley, A. (2022). Ways to improve secondary school teachers’ confidence in teaching food and nutrition subjects. Education Inquiry, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2116865
Newton, P. M., & Sackney, L. (2005). Group knowledge and group knowledge processes in school board decision making. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 28(3), 434. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126478
Noman, M., Awang Hashim, R., & Shaik Abdullah, S. (2018). Contextual leadership practices: The case of a successful school principal in Malaysia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216665840
Park, V. (2018). leading data conversation moves: Toward data-informed leadership for equity and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 617–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769050
Redmond, P., Smart, V., Powell, A., & Albion, P. (2021). Primary teachers’ self-assessment of their confidence in implementing digital technologies curriculum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2895–2915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10043-2
Saide, S., Indrajit, R. E., Trialih, R., Ramadhani, S., & Najamuddin, N. (2019). A theoretical and empirical validation of information technology and path-goal leadership on knowledge creation in university. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-06-2018-0067
Somech, A. (2010). Participative decision making in schools: A mediating-moderating analytical framework for understanding school and teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 174–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510361745
Young, C., McNamara, G., Brown, M., & O’Hara, J. (2018). Adopting and adapting: School leaders in the age of data-informed decision making. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30(2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9278-4
Yusof, H., Antisan, H., Mohd. Noor, Mohd. A., & Mansur, M. (2020). Teacher leadership and its relationship with high school students’ performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(10), Pages 243-259. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i10/7742
Zainuri, A. (2022). Implementation of independent curriculum learning in Islamic education and character subjects at MIN 1 Palembang. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 1229–1242. http://dx.doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i01.2961
Zhang, Y., & Henderson, D. (2018). Interactions between principals and teacher leaders in the context of Chinese curriculum reform: A micropolitical perspective. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(5), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0275-x
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Novan Ardy Wiyani, Novi Mulyani, Wan Alawee Samaeng

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.